<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 3.0: Web 2.0 With Pants &#8211; Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.suzemuse.com/2009/05/web-30-web-20-with-pants-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.suzemuse.com/2009/05/web-30-web-20-with-pants-part-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 3.0: Web 2.0 With Pants - Part II &#8211;</title>
		<link>http://www.suzemuse.com/2009/05/web-30-web-20-with-pants-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 3.0: Web 2.0 With Pants - Part II &#8211;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 11:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suzemuse.netfirms.com/?p=1658#comment-807</guid>
		<description>[...] is part two of a two part post on Web 3.0 by my friend Don. You can catch up by reading part one here. Today, Don takes us into the present day - exploring the current state of the Web and provides [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is part two of a two part post on Web 3.0 by my friend Don. You can catch up by reading part one here. Today, Don takes us into the present day &#8211; exploring the current state of the Web and provides [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://www.suzemuse.com/2009/05/web-30-web-20-with-pants-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suzemuse.netfirms.com/?p=1658#comment-806</guid>
		<description>With respect to Green_Ears&#039; comment, I suggest bulletin boards be added to that list.

During Web 1.0, collaboration was indeed one-step removed from disseminated information.  While there were web-based forums and web-based chat rooms during the dot-com era, information posted to someone&#039;s personal web page had to be linked to.

This also brings up an important issue about Web 2.0.  Where does the UseNet, E-mail and the like fit?  Although there are online interfaces to these services, they do not necessarily require HTTP.  O&#039;Reilly lumped everything &quot;not-Web 2.0&quot; together in one fell swoop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect to Green_Ears&#8217; comment, I suggest bulletin boards be added to that list.</p>
<p>During Web 1.0, collaboration was indeed one-step removed from disseminated information.  While there were web-based forums and web-based chat rooms during the dot-com era, information posted to someone&#8217;s personal web page had to be linked to.</p>
<p>This also brings up an important issue about Web 2.0.  Where does the UseNet, E-mail and the like fit?  Although there are online interfaces to these services, they do not necessarily require HTTP.  O&#8217;Reilly lumped everything &#8220;not-Web 2.0&#8243; together in one fell swoop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green_Ears</title>
		<link>http://www.suzemuse.com/2009/05/web-30-web-20-with-pants-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-805</link>
		<dc:creator>Green_Ears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suzemuse.netfirms.com/?p=1658#comment-805</guid>
		<description>Good overview so far!

However, in reference to Berniers-Lee&#039;s comment about Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0: &quot;This is more or less true and I would replace &quot;Web&quot; with &quot;Internet&quot;: &quot;If Web 2.0 for a particular person is about blogs and wikis, then it is about people. This is precisely what the Web was initially designed for, a collaborative space where people can interact.&quot;

I think back to newsgroups, email lists, MUD/MOO games, IRC chat rooms and instant messaging in terms of Internet collaboration in the old days.

The only real-time Web-based collaboration tool I remember is online discussion forums when I think of Web 1.0. From what I remember, Web 1.0 was initially focused disseminating information rather than engaging in a two-way sharing of information. The collaboration aspect happened via mediums outside of the Web 1.0.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good overview so far!</p>
<p>However, in reference to Berniers-Lee&#8217;s comment about Web 1.0 vs. Web 2.0: &#8220;This is more or less true and I would replace &#8220;Web&#8221; with &#8220;Internet&#8221;: &#8220;If Web 2.0 for a particular person is about blogs and wikis, then it is about people. This is precisely what the Web was initially designed for, a collaborative space where people can interact.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think back to newsgroups, email lists, MUD/MOO games, IRC chat rooms and instant messaging in terms of Internet collaboration in the old days.</p>
<p>The only real-time Web-based collaboration tool I remember is online discussion forums when I think of Web 1.0. From what I remember, Web 1.0 was initially focused disseminating information rather than engaging in a two-way sharing of information. The collaboration aspect happened via mediums outside of the Web 1.0.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

